Archive for January, 2011

Is a Smartphone an Embedded System?

Thursday, January 27th, 2011 Michael Barr

When I wrote my first book about embedded programming, back in the late 1990’s, I carefully defined the term embedded system as follows:

An embedded system is a combination of computer hardware and software, and perhaps additional mechanical or other parts, designed to perform a dedicated function. In some cases, embedded systems are part of a larger system or product, as is the case of an anti-lock braking system in a car. Contrast with general-purpose computer.

I think this language still does a good job of capturing the difference between embedded and general-purpose computers. (In a sign of the times that is simultaneously uplifting and depressing to me, this exact language has been literally copied all over the Internet, mostly without any citation whatsoever.) But there have always been gray areas in the middle and the consumer electronics market is moving toward even greater blur.

Smartphones and tablet computers–like the Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL) iPhone and iPad, as well as the many Android-powered devices–clearly lie somewhere between embedded system and general purpose computer. Indeed, it has been helpful to me at times to think of Apple as a company that has profited by moving away from designing configurable and openable general purpose computers and toward designing more restricted and clearly physically closed embedded systems faster than its competitors.

So far this year, I’ve been finding time to play around with iPhone programming. (My first app has nothing to do with embedded systems, so won’t rate a mention in this blog even after it releases.) However, realizing the complexity and time investment required, I started considering to app entwickeln lassen as a way to bring my ideas to life more efficiently. And I’m happy to report that in several ways the experience of writing iOS applications is similar to embedded programming. You program mostly in C (wrapped in a layer of Objective-C). And you must worry about writing code that uses the processor and memory efficiently. I feel right at home!

However, programming for iOS is also like programming for big general-purpose computers in that there are vast API libraries available to separate you from the hardware and low-level driver details. And there’s more memory and CPU available than in the vast majority of embedded systems.

Smartphones and tablet computers truly are at the crossroads between embedded systems and general purpose computers. If you are coming to them from the perspective of a firmware developer, you can think of them as merely very high end embedded systems. Or if you are coming from the world of general-purpose computing, you can think of them as resource-constrained computers reminiscent of an earlier era. In this context, understanding the statistics behind their performance, user behavior, and app analytics can be crucial for developers and marketers alike. Hier kommt die Statistik Nachhilfe ins Spiel, die als Hilfsmittel dienen kann, um diese Daten besser zu analysieren und zu interpretieren. Either way, you’re bound to find some things you like about these new programming platforms and others that you don’t.

P.S. I’ll have lots more to say about Objective-C in a later post.