<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bug cluster phenomenon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on embedded systems by Nigel Jones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 10:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Fortney</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Fortney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 02:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-651</guid>
		<description>I have found that using automatic source code style formatters (ctl + shift + f  in eclipse) helps out here.  no need to worry about style while writing and then just hit that at the end and everything gets cleaned up. a second benefit is people actually think i am careful about my coding ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that using automatic source code style formatters (ctl + shift + f  in eclipse) helps out here.  no need to worry about style while writing and then just hit that at the end and everything gets cleaned up. a second benefit is people actually think i am careful about my coding <img src='http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Jones</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>May be it&#039;s just me, but I find great difficulty in remembering regular expression syntax. The problem is that I just don&#039;t use them often enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be it&#8217;s just me, but I find great difficulty in remembering regular expression syntax. The problem is that I just don&#8217;t use them often enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uhmmmm</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Uhmmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>A regexp to exclude comments would look something like:[^*/]/[^*/]A quick grep of some sourcecode I have lying around shows that it works, but it also catches a few file paths (#include directives) and some text in comments.  But the vast majority of what it finds is division.Granted, it&#039;s more complex than searching for &quot; / &quot; and &quot; /= &quot;, but not significantly so if you know even basic regular expressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A regexp to exclude comments would look something like:[^*/]/[^*/]A quick grep of some sourcecode I have lying around shows that it works, but it also catches a few file paths (#include directives) and some text in comments.  But the vast majority of what it finds is division.Granted, it&#8217;s more complex than searching for &#8221; / &#8221; and &#8221; /= &#8220;, but not significantly so if you know even basic regular expressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>nice advice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice advice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Murphy</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Interesting point about being able to search for the operators. Similarly, I think the biggest advantage of new-style C++ casts is that they contain a unique string that can easily be searched (e.g. static_cast). In C style casting, if I decided to investigate all of the casts to unsigned int I would try to search for(unsigned int)(x)but it would  be hard to be sure of the spacing at the round braces will match and I might miss a related one like(const unsigned int)For all the fancy browsing tools out there, a simple text search is often the best way to track down certain operations, and finding casts by searching for &quot;_cast&quot; or &quot;static_cast&quot; is handy, because like the divisions you describe, casts are often the cause of bugs and require a second look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point about being able to search for the operators. Similarly, I think the biggest advantage of new-style C++ casts is that they contain a unique string that can easily be searched (e.g. static_cast). In C style casting, if I decided to investigate all of the casts to unsigned int I would try to search for(unsigned int)(x)but it would  be hard to be sure of the spacing at the round braces will match and I might miss a related one like(const unsigned int)For all the fancy browsing tools out there, a simple text search is often the best way to track down certain operations, and finding casts by searching for &#8220;_cast&#8221; or &#8220;static_cast&#8221; is handy, because like the divisions you describe, casts are often the cause of bugs and require a second look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul N. Leroux</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2008/10/bug-cluster-phenomenon/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul N. Leroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/10/08/bug-cluster-phenomenon/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hi Nigel. Your advice reminds me of an old proofreader&#039;s trick: When you find one typoe, look for another neerby. :-)- Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nigel. Your advice reminds me of an old proofreader&#8217;s trick: When you find one typoe, look for another neerby. <img src='http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> - Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

