<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RTOS Myth #2: RMA is for Academics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeddedgurus.com/barr-code/2008/03/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/barr-code/2008/03/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Michael Barr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/barr-code/2008/03/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/03/06/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve previously worked for a company selling a DMA (= Deadline Monotonic Analysis) solution, a close relative of RMA. The key piece of information that&#039;s really needed to do RMA or DMA is Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET). Funnily enough, I now work for a company that sells a WCET solution. www.RapitaSystems.com if you&#039;re interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve previously worked for a company selling a DMA (= Deadline Monotonic Analysis) solution, a close relative of RMA. The key piece of information that&#8217;s really needed to do RMA or DMA is Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET). Funnily enough, I now work for a company that sells a WCET solution. <a href="http://www.RapitaSystems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RapitaSystems.com</a> if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Barr</title>
		<link>http://embeddedgurus.com/barr-code/2008/03/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Barr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfcdev.org/test-stack/2008/03/06/rtos-myth-2-rma-is-for-academics/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an example of the misconception in action.  A professor at Vanderbilt University teaches a course about embedded systems, in which he states (slide 6 at the PDF linked below) that a system utilizing 68% or less of the CPU&#039;s cycles is &quot;Safe&quot; and acceptable for a &quot;High Consequence&quot; system.http://eecs.vanderbilt.edu/Courses/ee276/Fall06_lectures/02%20Events%20and%20determinism.pdfThe percentage 68% is ONLY meaningful IF the rate monotonic algorithm has been used to prioritize the tasks and the worst-case analysis is properly done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an example of the misconception in action.  A professor at Vanderbilt University teaches a course about embedded systems, in which he states (slide 6 at the PDF linked below) that a system utilizing 68% or less of the CPU&#8217;s cycles is &#8220;Safe&#8221; and acceptable for a &#8220;High Consequence&#8221; system.<a href="http://eecs.vanderbilt.edu/Courses/ee276/Fall06_lectures/02%20Events%20and%20determinism.pdfThe" rel="nofollow">http://eecs.vanderbilt.edu/Courses/ee276/Fall06_lectures/02%20Events%20and%20determinism.pdfThe</a> percentage 68% is ONLY meaningful IF the rate monotonic algorithm has been used to prioritize the tasks and the worst-case analysis is properly done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

